Question

What difference does the different normalization make with respect to the calculation of long-term evolutionary dynamics in the most simple models?

In particular: While relative fitness 2 can be held constant over generations because it does not depend on the (changing) relative frequencies of the given types, relative fitness 1 depends on the (changing) relative frequencies of the given types and therefore cannot be held constant over generations - is this correct?

Answer 1

Different normalization in the calculation of long-term evolutionary dynamics considers relative fitness. Relative fitness 2 can be held constant over generations, while relative fitness 1 depends on changing relative frequencies and cannot be held constant.

Step-by-step explanation:

The different normalization in the calculation of long-term evolutionary dynamics refers to the consideration of relative fitness. In simple models, relative fitness 2 can be held constant over generations because it does not depend on the changing relative frequencies of the given types. On the other hand, relative fitness 1 depends on the changing relative frequencies and therefore cannot be held constant.