Final answer:
Thiroux suggests that excluding emotions from moral reasoning does not mean it must be passionless or uncreative. Philosophers have recognized the importance of emotions in enhancing rationality. This illustrates that moral reasoning can be both rational and emotionally informed.
Step-by-step explanation:
Thiroux argues that the refusal to base moral theory on emotions does not imply that moral reasoning should be cold, calculating, and passionless. Moral theory development has sought foundations in reason, aiming to establish universal principles without leaning on emotions or divine origins for validation. However, rejecting an emotional basis for morality does not necessitate a turn to an impersonal reasoning style. Philosophers like Hume and feminists have criticized approaches that disconnect moral reasoning from emotion, while thinkers such as Damasio have emphasized that emotions inform and enhance our rational processes. This highlights that moral reasoning can be robust without being uncreative or lacking in compassion, demonstrating that rationality and emotion are not mutually exclusive in ethical considerations.