230k views
4 votes
Evaluate (mn)(x) for x = -3. (mn)(-3) = 9m n (x), x ≠ __________.

A) -3
B) 0
C) 3
D) Undefined

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

To evaluate (mn)(x) for x = -3, substitute -3 for x in the expression (mn)(x). The result is 9mn(-3), which is undefined.

Step-by-step explanation:

To evaluate (mn)(x) for x = -3, we simply substitute -3 for x in the expression. So (mn)(-3) = 9m n(-3). Since (-3) is different from 0, the correct answer is D) Undefined. It is important to note that when evaluating an expression for a specific value of x, we replace every instance of x in the expression with the given value.

In this case, we are replacing x with -3.Also, the expression seems to suggest a restriction or a point where the equation is not valid and asks for x ≠ ______ (?). Since the equation (mn)(-3) = 9m * n(x) suggests that the value of x specifically cannot be -3 when the equation holds, because we are given (mn)(-3) as a defined value equal to 9m * n(x), the blank in the question likely refers to the value we pick for x on the right-hand side of the equation to ensure it does not conflict with the left-hand side, which has x already as -3.

As for the choices provided: A) -3 - It is clear that when x = -3, (mn)(-3) is already given, so this value would not make sense, because it would imply (mn)(-3) equal to itself times a constant which is not logical. B) 0 - There’s no mention that x cannot be 0 or that it would create any issues in the expression, so there’s no reason to choose this option for the excluded value for x. C) 3 - Likewise, nothing in the information provided suggests any problems with x = 3. D) Undefined - It does not directly answer what x cannot be without additional context.

The correct exclusion would actually be choice A), -3, but it is worth noting that the expression and the question are quite ambiguous and incomplete.

Traditional algebra dictates that we should avoid a value for which the equation becomes undefined or contradictory. Therefore, since we are given (mn)(-3), we naturally exclude -3 from the right-hand side of the equation (x in 9m * n(x)) to avoid the conflict of taking the product of m and n at x = -3 and then trying to equate it to itself multiplied by a constant (9m).

User MG Lolenstine
by
8.5k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories