Final answer:
The results of the court cases Kent v. United States, In re Gault, and In re Winship established due process protections for juveniles, including the right to legal counsel and the standard of proof 'beyond a reasonable doubt' in juvenile court.
Step-by-step explanation:
The result of the court cases in juvenile justice—Kent v. United States, In re Gault, and In re Winship—was the establishment of due process protections for juveniles. In Kent v. United States, it was determined that juveniles are entitled to a waiver hearing before their cases can be transferred to adult court, which provided them with additional due process rights.
In re Gault established that juveniles have the right to notice of charges, right to counsel, right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, and the right to assert the privilege against self-incrimination. In re Winship set the standard of proof in juvenile court at 'beyond a reasonable doubt,' the same as for adult defendants.