Final answer:
The non-compete clause in Guyan Machinery's contract with Albert Voorhees is unlikely to be enforceable due to its overly broad geographic scope and the minimal impact of Voorhees' employment on Guyan's business. Option (C) is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
The non-compete clause in Guyan Machinery's contract with Albert Voorhees is not likely to be enforceable. Generally, non-compete clauses must meet certain requirements to be considered valid and enforceable. One of these requirements is that the clause must be reasonable in terms of geographic scope and duration.
In this case, the non-compete clause restricts Voorhees from working for a competing corporation anywhere within 250 miles of West Virginia for two years. Given that Polydeck Corp., the company Voorhees joined, is also a West Virginia manufacturer, the geographic scope of the non-compete clause is likely to be seen as too broad. Moreover, the fact that urethane screens comprise only a small fraction of Guyan's business suggests that Voorhees' employment at Polydeck would not pose a significant threat to Guyan's business interests.
As a result, Guyan is unlikely to be entitled to enforce its non-compete clause against Albert Voorhees.