170k views
3 votes
What was Peter's physical appearance? a. Extremely muscular, like a body builder. b. Rather overweight. c. actually only about 6' 2" tall - not very tall by modern standards. d. Very tall with small head.

User WAMLeslie
by
9.3k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

The question lacks context to accurately describe Peter's physical appearance; options include being muscular, overweight, about 6' 2" tall, or very tall with a small head. Historical or literary significance can influence the perception of these characteristics.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question 'What was Peter's physical appearance?' seems to require more context to provide an accurate response, as it lacks a clear identifier for who 'Peter' refers to. This could be a historical figure, a character from a book, or an individual from a specific context not provided in the question. Without additional information, it is not possible to determine whether Peter was extremely muscular, rather overweight, had a height of about 6' 2" tall, or was very tall with a small head. Historically, average heights have varied across different populations and time periods, so what is considered tall now might not have been considered tall in the past. In literature, characters' physical attributes are often used symbolically or to aid character development. Physical descriptions can infer qualities about the character's personality, role in the story, or historical significance.

User Bunyod
by
8.2k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.