Final answer:
The question incorrectly relates ammo distribution to the provided references about missiles, energy yield of bombs, and Strontium deposition. The detailed answer discusses the feasibility of missiles carrying multiple warheads and the height an aircraft carrier could be lifted by a nuclear depth charge's energy yield.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertaining to the rule of thumb for assigning a percentage for ammo on a mission seems to be a mix-up with other context or a hypothetical military protocol. However, using the references provided, we can discuss related physics concepts such as the mass of warheads carried by missiles and the energy yield of a nuclear depth charge. In terms of missile warhead capacity, given the complexity of warhead design and varying masses, it may not be reasonable for some missiles to carry as many as 10 warheads, especially when considering the additional components beyond just the nuclear fuel. For the energy yield question, we can calculate the lifting height of an aircraft carrier by setting the gravitational potential energy equal to half of the energy yield of the depth charge.
For example, assuming the nuclear depth charge has a yield of 1.00 kiloton (kT) and half of that energy is used to lift the carrier, the calculation would involve converting the kilotons to joules, finding the potential energy using the mass of the carrier which is given as 90,000 tons, and then solving for the height.
The calculation regarding Strontium (Sr) deposited from atmospheric weapons tests involves converting the activity in mega curies (MCi) to mass, which would require knowledge of Strontium's specific activity.