Final answer:
Rohit should consider whether the process he developed was created as part of his regular job duties or during nonwork hours. He should also consider if the process falls under any other category of intellectual property protection. Finally, assessing whether the process qualifies for copyright protection and any other applicable forms of intellectual property protection is important.
Step-by-step explanation:
Rohit should consider whether the process he developed was created as part of his regular job duties or during nonwork hours. If the process was created as part of his regular job duties, it may be considered a 'work made for hire' under the Copyright Act of 1976, and the rights to the process would likely belong to TPC. On the other hand, if the process was developed during nonwork hours and not within the scope of his employment, Rohit may have a stronger claim to the rights of the process.
Additionally, Rohit should also consider whether the process falls under any other category of intellectual property protection, such as patent or trademark. Copyright protection generally does not extend to processes or ideas, but rather to original expression in a fixed medium like a written document or computer code.
In summary, to make an informed decision, Rohit should assess whether the process was created as part of regular job duties, whether it qualifies for copyright protection, and whether any other forms of intellectual property protection might be applicable.