15.2k views
2 votes
Do you believe Steinberg or foster is more important artist or are they equally important?

User Chernikov
by
8.5k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The importance of artists like Steinberg and Foster is subjective and depends on various factors. In fields like lighting design, both technical and artistic skills are crucial. For music compositions, promoting pieces based on their artistic merit is key, rather than focusing on the racial or gender identity of the composers.

Step-by-step explanation:

Assessing the importance of artists such as Steinberg and Foster depends on various factors, including personal preferences, their impact on art history, and their contributions to their respective fields. It's not necessarily productive to deem one artist more important than the other, as importance can be subjective and context-dependent.

For instance, a lighting designer's work would be significantly enhanced by developing both technical skills and artistic skills. Technical skills ensure the practical feasibility of their designs, while artistic skills drive creativity and innovation, thus making both sets of skills indispensable.

In the context of music and compositions, the focus should ideally be on the qualities that make the pieces meaningful and unique, rather than on the race or gender of the composer. Championing compositions on the basis of their artistic merit allows audiences to appreciate the work for its intrinsic value, fostering a culture that appreciates diversity in artistic expression without preconceptions.

User CloudPotato
by
8.7k points