Final answer:
A company assessing two projects, Project A and Project B, must consider the scope, strategic fit, and evidence from both scholarly and non-scholarly sources. A formal proposal and structured response help in this evaluation. The selected project should align with the company's goals and offer an expected return on investment.
Step-by-step explanation:
When a company considers two projects, such as Project A and Project B, it needs to analyze various factors to determine which project to pursue. This involves looking at the scope of each project and the potential benefits and drawbacks. The company must evaluate the projects against its strategic objectives and resources availability.
The process starts with a proposal that includes an introduction explaining the need for the service or project, just like someone might propose a toast or marriage. In business contexts, needs could range from requiring an extra bathroom to revising a website. After understanding the problem, a company makes predictions and uses reasoning to decide on solutions.
To thoroughly examine the projects, the company writes an analytical report summarizing the scope, the idea they are investigating, and their thesis. They also review scholarly literature and non-scholarly information, comparing and contrasting these sources to determine the validity of their thesis. After critically assessing the evidence, the company may decide to stick with or amend their original thesis based on scientific evidence.
Lastly, in determining the feasibility of Project A or Project B, the company must provide a structured response that takes a position and supports it with specific reasons and examples. This careful evaluation ensures that the selected project aligns with the company's goals and provides the expected return on investment.