123k views
5 votes
Are the expressions \(8(9-6x+11)\) and \(15+\frac{3}{2}(-32x+120)-35\) equivalent to \(-16(3x-10)\)?

A) Yes, the expressions are equivalent.

B) No, the expressions are not equivalent.

User Jeane
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

5 votes

We've simplified each expression, we can clearly see that:
Expression 1:
\(160 - 48x\)
Expression 2:
\(160 - 48x\)
Expression 3:
\(-48x + 160\)
All three expressions are equivalent to one another, since each simplifies to the same combination of terms.
Therefore, the answer is option: A) Yes, the expressions are equivalent.

Let's examine each expression step by step to see if they are equivalent to the given expression
\(-16(3x-10)\).
**Expression 1:
\(8(9-6x+11)\)**
Simplify by distributing the 8 across each term inside the parentheses:

\[8 \cdot 9 - 8 \cdot 6x + 8 \cdot 11 = 72 - 48x + 88\]
Combine the constant terms:

\[72 + 88 = 160\]
Now, the expression is:

\[160 - 48x\]

**Expression 2:
\(15+(3)/(2)(-32x+120)-35\)**
Before distributing, simplify the constant terms outside the parentheses:

\[15 - 35 = -20\]
Now, distribute
\((3)/(2)\) across each term inside the parentheses:

\[(3)/(2) \cdot (-32x) + (3)/(2) \cdot 120 = -48x + 180\]
Now, the expression is:

\[180 - 48x - 20\]
Combine the constant terms:

\[180 - 20 = 160\]
So, the second expression becomes:

\[160 - 48x\]

**Expression 3:
\(-16(3x-10)\)**
Distribute the
\(-16\) across each term inside the parentheses:

\[-16 \cdot 3x + -16 \cdot (-10) = -48x + 160\]
So, the third expression is:

\[-48x + 160\]
Now that we've simplified each expression, we can clearly see that:
Expression 1:
\(160 - 48x\)
Expression 2:
\(160 - 48x\)
Expression 3:
\(-48x + 160\)
All three expressions are equivalent to one another, since each simplifies to the same combination of terms.
Therefore, the answer is:z
A) Yes, the expressions are equivalent.

User Mark Michon
by
9.3k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.