Final answer:
The review process usually results in a confirmation of compliance and can improve credibility and promote self-regulation, but local program directors' reactions in the mini-case study suggest a need for independent assessment and the establishment of more collaborative global institutions.
Step-by-step explanation:
The end result of a review process showing voluntary compliance with the guidelines of an external, non-profit organization is generally the acknowledgment that the programs or institutions being reviewed meet or exceed the set standards of quality and practices endorsed by the external organization. This endorsement can enhance the credibility and trustworthiness of the programs among stakeholders and can lead to a change in perception, promoting better self-regulation. In the case provided, despite the local programs being in line with the national organization's vision and mission to some extent and having elements of success, the local directors' adverse reactions to written recommendations highlight a potential need for establishing more collaborative global institutions for governance discussions and might argue for independent bodies to vet compliance, ensuring objectivity and transparency.