Final answer:
The central claim in the passage is that objections to the Constitution should be dismissed unless they are unanimous. The author argues for the importance of a fixed and permanent interpretation of the Constitution and the significance of a bill of rights in safeguarding against abuses of power.
Step-by-step explanation:
The author's central claim in the passage is that the objections to the Constitution should be dismissed unless they are unanimous. The passage emphasizes the importance of a fixed and permanent interpretation of the Constitution, where judges should not deviate from the literal meaning of the text. The author argues that while a bill of rights may not be completely effective in all circumstances, it is still potent and necessary in protecting against the abuses of power.