110k views
0 votes
The author's central claim in the passage is that

А the Constitution will have to suffice until it is
proven to be inadequate.
B the objections to the Constitution are trivial and
should be disregarded by the Assembly.
C. the objections to the Constitution can be
dismissed unless they are unanimous.
D the Constitution is adequate and should be passed
without objection.

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

The central claim in the passage is that objections to the Constitution should be dismissed unless they are unanimous. The author argues for the importance of a fixed and permanent interpretation of the Constitution and the significance of a bill of rights in safeguarding against abuses of power.

Step-by-step explanation:

The author's central claim in the passage is that the objections to the Constitution should be dismissed unless they are unanimous. The passage emphasizes the importance of a fixed and permanent interpretation of the Constitution, where judges should not deviate from the literal meaning of the text. The author argues that while a bill of rights may not be completely effective in all circumstances, it is still potent and necessary in protecting against the abuses of power.

User Ahmad Ferdous
by
7.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.