110k views
0 votes
The author's central claim in the passage is that

А the Constitution will have to suffice until it is
proven to be inadequate.
B the objections to the Constitution are trivial and
should be disregarded by the Assembly.
C. the objections to the Constitution can be
dismissed unless they are unanimous.
D the Constitution is adequate and should be passed
without objection.

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

The central claim in the passage is that objections to the Constitution should be dismissed unless they are unanimous. The author argues for the importance of a fixed and permanent interpretation of the Constitution and the significance of a bill of rights in safeguarding against abuses of power.

Step-by-step explanation:

The author's central claim in the passage is that the objections to the Constitution should be dismissed unless they are unanimous. The passage emphasizes the importance of a fixed and permanent interpretation of the Constitution, where judges should not deviate from the literal meaning of the text. The author argues that while a bill of rights may not be completely effective in all circumstances, it is still potent and necessary in protecting against the abuses of power.

User Ahmad Ferdous
by
6.9k points