Final answer:
The assertion that moral objectivity cannot allow for legitimate cultural variation is false. While moral relativism supports cultural variation in morality, moral realism suggests the existence of universal moral truths that transcend cultural differences, indicating that some moral objectivity can indeed coexist with cultural variations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question 'Moral Objectivity Cannot Allow for Legitimate Cultural Variation?' deals with the philosophical debate of moral objectivity versus ethical relativism. The answer to this question is False, as according to moral realism, there can be objective moral truths that apply regardless of cultural variation. However, ethical relativism, specifically normative ethical relativism, posits that morality is determined by cultural norms and thus can vary legitimately from one culture to another. On the other hand, moral objectivity implies the existence of universal moral facts which could potentially conflict with the idea of legitimate cultural variation.
While some argue that cultural differences in morality prove relativism, others point to common moral principles, like the wrongness of unjustified killing, suggesting a foundational objective morality. Moreover, the criticism and reform of certain moral practices within cultures, through minority views challenging the majority, indicate potential flaws in the consistency of normative ethical relativism. Moral skepticism further complicates the discussion by questioning the very existence of objective moral facts.