Final answer:
To win a quasi-contract case, Barrett must demonstrate that the defendant received a benefit, would be unjustly enriched without paying, that the plaintiff expected compensation, and that no actual contract exists, all by a preponderance of the evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Requirements to Win a Quasi-Contract Case
To win a case under quasi-contract, Barrett must demonstrate certain elements to satisfy the burden of proof for a quasi-contract claim. Unlike traditional contracts which are based on the clear agreement between parties, a quasi-contract is a legal construct whereby the court imposes an obligation on one party to prevent unjust enrichment to another, even though no real contract exists. The elements Barrett must show include:
- The defendant received a benefit.
- The defendant's retention of the benefit without compensating the plaintiff would be unjust.
- The plaintiff provided the benefit with a reasonable expectation of compensation.
- There was no actual contract between the parties.
The burden of proof in a civil case like this is preponderance of the evidence. This means Barrett must prove that it is more likely than not, that the circumstances fall within these elements. Barrett does not have to prove the case to the extent of 'beyond a reasonable doubt,' which is a stricter standard required in criminal cases.