178k views
5 votes
In performing a review of a client's cash disbursements, an auditor uses systematic sample selection with a random start. The primary disadvantage of this technique is population items :

User Hiroki
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The primary disadvantage of using systematic sample selection with a random start in auditing is the potential for periodicity bias, where the sampling interval may align with a pattern in the population, leading to an unrepresentative sample and potential bias in the results.

Step-by-step explanation:

In performing a review of a client's cash disbursements, an auditor uses systematic sample selection with a random start. The primary disadvantage of this technique is that population items may be clustered in a pattern that the systematic selection inadvertently aligns with, leading to an unrepresentative sample. This sampling method can lead to bias if the sampling interval corresponds with a certain pattern within the population. For example, if a pattern occurs every 10th entry in the client's ledger and the auditor samples every 10th voucher starting from a random point, they might pick up only those particular transactions aligned with the pattern, missing out on a broader range of cash disbursements. This is known as the risk of a periodicity bias and is a significant disadvantage of systematic sampling when compared to other methods like simple random sampling, where each sample has an equal chance of being chosen.

User Zomnombom
by
7.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.