Final answer:
The conclusion of the argument is statement 1), 'The government should enact legislation permitting euthanasia,' as it logically follows from the supporting premises about autonomy and dignity.
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
When examining the statements given and trying to identify the conclusion of the argument, it is important to understand the structure of logical arguments. Conclusions are generally statements that logically follow from a set of premises. In the context provided, statement 1),
'The government should enact legislation permitting euthanasia.', stands as the conclusion that follows from the argument's supporting claims about autonomy, dignity, and rights. Statements 2) and 3) can be considered premises that support the conclusion. Statement 2) deals with the autonomy denied without the legislation, and statement 3) asserts a right related to dignity and choice. Therefore, the conclusion of the argument is statement 1).