Final answer:
The assertion that the constellation theory cannot recommend prevention measures for school shootings is false. While it may not predict specific instances, it can still inform risk management and contribute to preventing potential incidents. The value of a theory doesn't solely rest on a precise prediction but on the broader understanding and guidance it provides.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement regarding the constellation theory by Newman and its inability to predict school shooters is false. The theory may not be able to predict individual cases with certainty, but that does not necessarily disqualify it from offering valid prevention measures. Prevention strategies often are about managing risk factors and reducing probabilities rather than providing precise predictions. Recognizing patterns or factors that are often present can still be incredibly valuable in forming a contextual understanding and subsequently, precautionary or preventative actions.
It's important to note that the inability to predict a specific event does not negate the potential contribution a theory might make towards mitigation or overall understanding of a phenomenon. Furthermore, just because a theory cannot make exact predictions doesn't mean it lacks value. Theories can guide hypotheses, shape future research, and combine with other theories to provide a broader picture.
In terms of theories in education and science, it's asserted that introducing more theories doesn't necessarily confuse students, nor does it mean that there are no viable scientific alternatives. Alternatives are not always suppressed by the scientific establishment; sometimes they simply need more empirical evidence for broader acceptance.