217k views
0 votes
Which represents a valid approach to critiquing a scientific explanation?

a. using experimental testing
b. using observational evidence
c. analyzing the logical reasoning of the explanation
d. all of the above

User Xywang
by
8.7k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

A valid approach to critiquing a scientific explanation involves using experimental testing, observational evidence, and analyzing the logical reasoning. Hence the correct answer is option D

Step-by-step explanation:

When critiquing a scientific explanation, a valid approach would involve:

  1. Using experimental testing: Conducting experiments to gather data and observe the outcomes can help evaluate the validity of a scientific explanation.
  2. Using observational evidence: Observing real-world phenomena and collecting relevant data can provide supporting evidence or help identify flaws in a scientific explanation.
  3. Analyzing the logical reasoning of the explanation: Evaluating the logical consistency and coherence of the explanation is essential to determine its validity.

Therefore, the correct answer is d. all of the above.

User Manushi
by
8.4k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories