217k views
0 votes
Which represents a valid approach to critiquing a scientific explanation?

a. using experimental testing
b. using observational evidence
c. analyzing the logical reasoning of the explanation
d. all of the above

User Xywang
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

A valid approach to critiquing a scientific explanation involves using experimental testing, observational evidence, and analyzing the logical reasoning. Hence the correct answer is option D

Step-by-step explanation:

When critiquing a scientific explanation, a valid approach would involve:

  1. Using experimental testing: Conducting experiments to gather data and observe the outcomes can help evaluate the validity of a scientific explanation.
  2. Using observational evidence: Observing real-world phenomena and collecting relevant data can provide supporting evidence or help identify flaws in a scientific explanation.
  3. Analyzing the logical reasoning of the explanation: Evaluating the logical consistency and coherence of the explanation is essential to determine its validity.

Therefore, the correct answer is d. all of the above.

User Manushi
by
7.7k points