Final answer:
Mala in se crimes are acts that are considered inherently evil or wrong, while mala prohibita crimes are acts that are considered illegal because they are prohibited by law. The main difference is the inherent nature of the act, with mala in se crimes being universally wrong and immoral, while mala prohibita crimes are wrong solely because the law prohibits them.
Step-by-step explanation:
When it comes to crimes, there are two categories: mala in se and mala prohibita. Mala in se crimes are acts that are considered inherently evil or wrong, such as murder or theft. These crimes are universally condemned and are seen as immoral in any society. On the other hand, mala prohibita crimes are acts that are considered illegal because they are prohibited by law, even though they may not be inherently wrong. Examples of mala prohibita crimes include traffic violations or drug possession.
The main difference between mala in se and mala prohibita crimes is the inherent nature of the act. Mala in se crimes are acts that are universally wrong and immoral, regardless of the law, while mala prohibita crimes are acts that are wrong solely because the law prohibits them. Additionally, punishments for mala in se crimes are generally more severe than punishments for mala prohibita crimes since the former involves acts that are considered more morally reprehensible.
Overall, understanding the differences between mala in se and mala prohibita crimes helps to distinguish between acts that are inherently wrong and those that are only wrong because they are prohibited by law.