Final answer:
Judging the ethics of a decision by only considering the perspective of a manager or employee is false. Ethical decision-making requires a broader approach, assessing actions through moral deliberation and application of ethical principles that consider the interests and impacts on all stakeholders involved.
Step-by-step explanation:
The assertion that the best way to judge the ethics of a decision is to look at it from a manager's or employee's point of view is false. Ethical decision-making, especially in applied ethics, often involves considering a broader scope than individual or internal corporate perspectives. When making decisions, humans do not focus solely on their own interests but often consider the interests of themselves and others, reflecting on the rightness or wrongness of actions through moral deliberation and the application of ethical principles. This means evaluating decisions from multiple viewpoints, including but not limited to those of managers or employees, and considering the potential impact on all stakeholders involved.
Instances of ethical dilemmas in business and organizations showcase that managers can have conflicting interests that may lead to an ethically questionable environment. For example, a project manager might pressure an evaluator to alter a report to enhance outcomes or a manager might dismiss the importance of employee feedback for organizational betterment. Such scenarios underscore why a singular viewpoint is insufficient for assessing the ethicality of decisions. Philosophers like Rawls suggest considering actions against principles that champion the utmost benefit for the least advantaged, which implies a broader ethical perspective beyond personal or positional views.