Final answer:
The false statement about billing schemes is that the perpetrator takes physical possession of his or her employer's cash. Instead, billing schemes typically involve fraudulent invoicing without direct cash handling. An accused employee can defend against theft accusations with evidence and legal support.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that is not true of billing schemes is: A. The perpetrator takes physical possession of his or her employer's cash. Billing schemes are a type of fraud where a perpetrator uses false documentation to divert funds from his or her employer to themselves, often without direct handling of cash. It's a common practice to set up 'dummy' companies to submit fake invoices that the employer pays. These schemes are indeed among the most common types of disbursement fraud (item C), and they usually involve interactions with the purchasing department (item D) as this is where invoice payments are typically processed.
An example of corporate crime is embezzlement (option a), which is the misappropriation of funds placed in one's trust. In the scenario provided, if the cashier is wrongfully accused of theft, they might deal with the label by seeking evidence to prove their innocence, such as surveillance footage, transaction records, or testimony from colleagues. They may also seek legal advice or representation to challenge the accusation formally.