Final answer:
Wynona's peers and role models justify stealing from high end designer companies because they view these companies as exploitative and possess the financial means to withstand theft. This reflects a complex interplay of moral judgments and the idea that fighting perceived exploitation can outweigh legal norms.
Step-by-step explanation:
Wynona's peers and role models consider stealing from high end designer companies to be morally acceptable for a couple of reasons. They perceive these companies as exploitative and believe that they have ample financial resources to absorb the losses (money to cover the costs). This situation highlights a conflict between ethical theories and social perceptions of justice and economic inequality.
In the context of Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development, this reasoning could reflect a post-conventional morality wherein the value system of Wyona's group places a higher moral priority on addressing exploitation than on adherence to laws against theft. The justifications provided by Wynona's peers and role models tap into both the perception of corporate wrongdoing and the consequentialist idea that the ends (fighting exploitation) justify the means (stealing from these companies). This aligns with historical and literary discussions on moral flexibility, which suggest that individuals and societies sometimes view certain crimes as justifiable or even necessary when committed in response to greater injustices or for a perceived higher good.