183k views
1 vote
Royals games cost $20 per ticket plus a one-time $12 fee. A season ticket costs $290. How many games would you have to attend so a season ticket is a better deal than buying individual tickets? what number is on the other side of the inequality?

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

To determine how many games you would have to attend for a season ticket to be a better deal than buying individual tickets, compare the total cost of buying individual tickets for that number of games to the cost of a season ticket. The number of games you would have to attend is 14.

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine how many games you would have to attend for a season ticket to be a better deal than buying individual tickets, we need to compare the total cost of buying individual tickets for that number of games to the cost of a season ticket.

Let's assume the number of games you would have to attend is 'x'. The total cost of buying individual tickets for 'x' games would be:

Total cost = (cost per ticket * number of games) + one-time fee = (20 * x) + 12

The cost of a season ticket is given as $290. Now we need to find the value of 'x' at which the total cost of buying individual tickets is greater than the cost of a season ticket. In other words, we need to solve the inequality:

(20 * x) + 12 > 290

Simplifying the inequality, we get:

20x > 278

x > 13.9

Since the number of games cannot be a decimal or a fraction, we round up to the nearest whole number. Therefore, you would have to attend at least 14 games for a season ticket to be a better deal than buying individual tickets. The number on the other side of the inequality is 14.

User Niva
by
8.4k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.