Final answer:
Privacy rights are controversial as they are not explicitly stated in the Bill of Rights. The Supreme Court has recognized these rights through interpretation of the Constitution, particularly the Fourth and Ninth Amendments, in landmark cases affecting personal liberties. Therefore correct option is B
Step-by-step explanation:
Privacy rights are controversial for a number of reasons, one of which is that they are not explicitly stated in the Bill of Rights. Another significant aspect is that the Supreme Court has recognized the right to privacy through various amendments, and has applied it in landmark cases, thereby expanding the scope of rights protected by the Constitution.
For instance, the Fourth Amendment's protection against "unreasonable searches and seizures" and the Fourteenth Amendment's principles of due process and equal protection have both been interpreted to imply a right to privacy. Moreover, the Ninth Amendment is often considered a foundation for the judicial understanding of privacy, as it protects rights not specifically mentioned in the Constitution. This indicates that the courts can recognize and protect fundamental rights based on Constitutional principles, even if they are not expressly outlined in the document.
Privacy rights have also been at the center of numerous Supreme Court cases, such as Griswold v. Connecticut and Roe v. Wade, which have elicited strong public reactions. These cases involved issues such as access to birth control and women's rights to have an abortion, making privacy rights a highly debated topic.