The best support for the statement on judicial interpretation comes from the passage about Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, who believed that the Constitution must be viewed in the context of current experiences rather than solely in historical terms.
The article portion that best supports the statement "Interpretation of the Constitution can be subject to a justice's understanding of the world" is from the segment that describes Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes's view on the Constitution.
Specifically, it mentions that Holmes argued the Constitution "must be considered in the light of our whole experience and not merely in that of what was said a hundred years ago." This suggests that a justice's understanding of the Constitution may evolve with time to address the felt necessities and social ends of the contemporary world.