Final answer:
The right of association in the context of the Supreme Court's legal interpretation refers to the freedom to form and join organizations to pursue common goals or express shared beliefs. However, the Court has held that there is no absolute right of association, allowing the government to impose restrictions or limitations under certain circumstances.
Step-by-step explanation:
The right of association in the context of the Supreme Court's legal interpretation refers to the freedom to form and join organizations, groups, or associations to pursue common goals or to express shared beliefs. It is considered an "inseparable aspect" of the Constitution's guarantees of free expression because it enables individuals to collectively advocate for their interests or exercise their rights. However, the Court has also held that there is no absolute right of association, meaning that the government can impose certain restrictions or limitations on association under certain circumstances, such as for compelling state interests or for maintaining public order. For example, if an association is engaged in unlawful activities or poses a threat to national security, the government may restrict or prohibit its existence.
Learn more about The right of association and its interpretation by the Supreme Court