Question

D the passage from the opinion of the court in Dred

ttv Sandford, written by Justice Taney.
question before us is, whether the class of persons
cribed in the plea in abatement compose a portion
this people, and are constituent members of this
ereignty? We think they are not, and that they are
included, and were not intended to be included,
der the word "citizens" in the Constitution, and can
refore claim none of the rights and privileges which
at instrument provides for and secures to citizens of
e United States. On the contrary, they were at that
me considered as a subordinate and inferior class of
ings, who had been subjugated by the dominant
ce, and, whether emancipated or not, yet remained
bject to their authority, and had no rights or privileges
ut such as those who held the power and the
overnment might choose to grant them.
ark this and return
What type of logical error underlies the argument that
Black people were inferior?
O genetic fallacy
O begging the claim
O hasty generalization
O ad populum

Answer 1

The logical error underlying the argument is 'begging the claim' because it assumes the conclusion to be true without evidence.

Step-by-step explanation:

The logical error that underlies the argument that Black people were inferior in the passage from the opinion of the court in Dred Scott v. Sandford is begging the claim. Begging the claim occurs when the conclusion of an argument is assumed to be true without providing evidence or support. In this case, the argument assumes that Black people were considered inferior based on their subordinate status at the time and does not provide any objective evidence to support this claim.

Learn more about Logical error in Dred Scott v. Sandford