Question

Read the passage from the opinion of the court in Dred

Scott v. Sandford, written by Justice Taney.
The question before us is, whether the class of persons
described in the plea in abatement compose a portion
of this people, and are constituent members of this
sovereignty? We think they are not, and that they are
not included, and were not intended to be included,
under the word "citizens" in the Constitution, and can
therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which
that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of
the United States. On the contrary, they were at that
time considered as a subordinate and inferior class of
beings, who had been subjugated by the dominant
race, and, whether emancipated or not, yet remained
subject to their authority, and had no rights or privileges
but such as those who held the power and the
Government might choose to grant them.
What is Taney's claim in this passage?
O that Black people were covered by the Constitution's
definition of citizen
O that emancipated Black people had rights
guaranteed by the government
O that Black people were not part of the group
considered citizens by the Constitution
O that Black people would have to get the
government's permission to be citizens

Answer 1

Taney's claim in this passage is that Black people were not considered citizens by the Constitution.

Step-by-step explanation:

In this passage, Taney's claim is that Black people were not part of the group considered citizens by the Constitution. He argues that they were seen as a subordinate and inferior class of beings who were subjugated by the dominant race. As a result, they did not have the same rights and privileges as citizens of the United States, and the Constitution did not include them as citizens.

Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford