Final answer:
New planes and tanks made it more difficult to end World War I because they introduced new forms of warfare that forced both sides to adapt and develop new tactics. The financial strain of manufacturing these inventions also contributed to global bankruptcy.
Step-by-step explanation:
We can infer that new planes and tanks made it more difficult to end World War I for several reasons. Firstly, the development of planes gave each side the capability to conduct aerial reconnaissance, gather intelligence, and launch air attacks on enemy territory. This made it harder for one side to gain a significant advantage over the other. Additionally, the introduction of tanks on the battlefield provided a new form of mobile firepower that could break through entrenched positions and exploit weaknesses in the enemy's defenses. This forced both sides to constantly adapt and develop new tactics and defenses, prolonging the war.
An example of this can be seen in the Battle of Cambrai in 1917, where the British introduced a large number of tanks to break through the heavily fortified German lines. While initially successful, the lack of infantry support and mechanical failures hindered their progress, and the Germans were able to counterattack and regain the lost territory. This highlights the ongoing challenge of effectively using these new inventions in the war.
Furthermore, the development and production of planes and tanks required significant resources and funding. This diverted resources away from other aspects of the war effort, such as providing adequate supplies and support to the troops. The financial strain of manufacturing these new inventions also contributed to global bankruptcy, as countries had to borrow money or print more currency to cover the costs.
Learn more about Effects of new planes and tanks in World War I