Question

Dred Scott vs. Sanford was heard by the Supreme Court of 1857 occurred when a slave was taken by

his owners to a free territory. Dred Scott sued for his freedom. The Supreme Court decided:
O Dred Scott could be free, but only if he could show paperwork supporting that he was a free man, which of
course, he did not have.
Dred Scott, and other Black people in similar situations, had the right to be free.
Dred Scott, and other Black people, had not only no right to sue, but no rights that white people had to
respect.
O Black people born into slavery would remain enslaved, unless their owners freed them. Those born into
freedom could remain free, unless they went to states that allowed slavery.

Answer 1

The Supreme Court's decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford determined that Black people had no rights that white people were bound to respect and that Black people born into slavery would remain enslaved.

Step-by-step explanation:

The subject of this question is History. The case being referred to is Dred Scott v. Sandford, which was heard by the Supreme Court in 1857. Dred Scott, a slave, sued for his freedom after being taken by his owners to a free territory. The Supreme Court's decision determined that Dred Scott and other Black people in similar situations had no rights that white people were bound to respect. It also stated that Black people born into slavery would remain enslaved, unless their owners freed them. Those born into freedom could remain free, unless they went to states that allowed slavery.

Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford