Question

thresa is a highly paid heart surgeon. the argument for thresa being highly paid is: a heart surgeon is functionally more important than other positions or roles in society and a limited number of individuals have the talent or experience for this position. which theory would agree with this statement:

Answer 1

The Davis-Moore thesis would agree with the statement that a highly paid heart surgeon is functionally more important than other positions in society. According to this theory, social stratification necessitates greater rewards for roles that are more important.

Step-by-step explanation:

The theory that would agree with the statement that a highly paid heart surgeon is functionally more important than other positions or roles in society and that a limited number of individuals have the talent or experience for this position is the Davis-Moore thesis. According to this theory, social stratification is a social necessity, and the greater the functional importance of a social role, the greater must be the reward. This theory explains the prestige and salaries that come with careers only available to those with doctorates or medical degrees.

Answer 2

The Davis-Moore thesis supports the notion that Theresa is highly paid as her role as a heart surgeon is functionally important and such talents are scarce. It connects social reward to the essential nature of a job, suggesting that greater functional importance justifies higher compensation.

Step-by-step explanation:

The theory that agrees with the statement that Theresa, a highly paid heart surgeon, is compensated based on the functional importance of her role and the scarcity of individuals with her talent and experience, is the Davis-Moore thesis. This thesis posits that social stratification is a social necessity, where the reward and thus the salary are correspondingly high for jobs that are crucial to the functioning of society and require extensive education and training. Moreover, it acknowledges that certain positions, such as heart surgeons, are functionally more important and therefore deserve higher compensation. However, it is important to note criticisms by scholars like Melvin Tumin, who argued that the Davis-Moore thesis does not adequately account for inequalities stemming from education, race, gender, or the value and compensation some individuals receive despite lesser contributions to society.