13.6k views
2 votes
Pls help 2 questions

1. President Lincoln was warned by some of his advisors against issuing the Emancipation Proclamation. What were their fears and what was Lincoln's viewpoint?

2. What was ironic about Missouri's participation in the war?

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

President Lincoln's advisors who were against the Emancipation Proclamation were concerned that it could negatively affect the Union's military efforts during the Civil War. Specifically, they worried that it could push border states that were still loyal to the Union, such as Kentucky and Maryland, into secession and into joining the Confederacy.

Additionally, some feared that the proclamation could undermine public support for the war effort and hurt the Union's chances of victory. They also worried about potential backlash from Northerners who were opposed to abolition and could potentially vote against Lincoln in the upcoming 1864 presidential election.

Despite these concerns, President Lincoln ultimately believed that issuing the Emancipation Proclamation was a necessary step in ending slavery and winning the war. He saw slavery as a moral issue and thought that it was incompatible with the principles of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.

In addition to the moral imperative, Lincoln saw the Emancipation Proclamation as a way to undermine the Confederacy's economic and military power. By freeing slaves in the Confederacy, he hoped to weaken the South's labour force and deprive it of a crucial source of support.

Overall, Lincoln believed that issuing the Emancipation Proclamation was essential for the Union's ultimate victory and the preservation of the nation's founding principles.

User Salahy
by
7.9k points
2 votes
1. President Lincoln was warned by some of his advisors against issuing the Emancipation Proclamation. What were their fears and what was Lincoln's viewpoint?
Some of President Lincoln's advisors were concerned that issuing the Emancipation Proclamation would be seen as a desperate measure, and that it would not be effective in ending the Civil War. They were also worried that it would anger the border states that remained loyal to the Union but still allowed slavery, and that it would hurt the Union's relationship with Europe, which relied heavily on Southern cotton.

However, Lincoln believed that the Emancipation Proclamation was a necessary step in ending the war and ultimately freeing the slaves. He saw it as a way to weaken the Confederacy by depriving it of its labor force, and as a way to inspire African Americans to join the Union army and fight for their freedom. Lincoln also believed that it was a moral imperative to end slavery, and that history would judge him harshly if he did not take action.

2. What was ironic about Missouri's participation in the war?
Missouri's participation in the Civil War was ironic because it was a border state that was divided in its loyalties. The state had a significant population of both Unionists and Confederates, and it was the site of many battles and skirmishes throughout the war. Missouri officially remained in the Union, but it was also home to a Confederate government-in-exile that operated in the southern part of the state.

Despite Missouri's official loyalty to the Union, many of its citizens fought for the Confederacy, and it was the site of several important Confederate victories early in the war. However, the Union was eventually able to gain control of the state, and Missouri became an important center of Union activity and support. In many ways, Missouri's participation in the war epitomized the complex and divisive nature of the conflict, and the challenges that the Union faced in trying to hold the country together.
User Arcquim
by
6.9k points