Explanation:
something if wrong here.
3(2x + 6)² for x = 2 is
3(2×2 + 6)² = 3(4 + 6)² = 3(10)² = 3×100 = 300
this IS correct, as you can easily see by following my calculation steps.
but none of your answer options show 300.
I could imagine that the expression was meant to be maybe
(3(2x + 6) + 6)²
and then
(3(2×2 + 6) + 6)² = (3(4 + 6) + 6)² = (3×10 + 6)² =
= (30 + 6)² = 36² = 1296