Question

Which two statements correctly identify the effect that a switch in narration from third-person omniscient to third-person limited has on a story? The switch in narration increases the proximity of the narrator to the main character. The true details about past and future events are more easily shown to the reader. The reader can perceive information only through the filter of a single character. The inner thoughts of all the characters are revealed to the reader by the narrator.

Answer 1

I believe the answers are:

The switch in narration increases the proximity of the narrator to the main character.

The reader can perceive information only through the filter of a single character

In a third person omniscient, the narrator is someone that know it all, from the past ,present, and future of every characters.

In Third-person limited, the narrator only know the past,present, and future of the main characters. So, this would increase the proximity that the narrator has upon the main character, but it made the narrator provide the information beside those that is known by the main character.

Answer 2

The switch basically consists of knowing less rather than more, more like people in real life do. It usually limits itself to knowing what only one character, typically the main character, can know. the correct answers are:
The reader can perceive information only through the filter of a single character.
The switch in narration increases the proximity of the narrator to the main character.