Question

Many cities suffer from serious air and noise pollution—as well as endless traffic jams—because of too many cars. Some people feel that cities with extensive public transportation systems should ban passenger cars and force people to walk, bike, or use public transportation. Do you think this is a good idea? Why or why not?

Answer 1

Banning passenger cars and promoting public transportation in cities is a good idea for reducing pollution and traffic congestion.

Step-by-step explanation:

I believe that banning passenger cars and promoting the use of public transportation in cities is a good idea. This approach can help reduce air and noise pollution, alleviate traffic congestion, and improve overall quality of life. By encouraging people to walk, bike, or use public transportation, cities can create a more sustainable and livable environment for their residents.

One example of a city that has successfully implemented this approach is Copenhagen, Denmark. The city has an extensive public transportation system, including a well-connected network of bike lanes. As a result, more than 60% of residents commute by bike or public transportation. This has significantly reduced air pollution and traffic congestion in the city.

Additionally, adopting this approach can have numerous benefits, such as promoting physical activity, reducing carbon emissions, and improving public health. Overall, I believe that cities with comprehensive public transportation systems should consider implementing policies that restrict the use of passenger cars in order to create a cleaner, more sustainable urban environment.

Answer 2

Answer: I do think its a good idea cause it lessens pollution in the air we breathe in and stops us from burning fossil fuels

Step-by-step explanation: