11.4k views
3 votes
When looking at a rational function, Charles and Bobby have two different thoughts. Charles says that the function is defined at x = -2, x = 3, and x = 5. Bobby says that the function is undefined at those x values. Describe a situation where Charles is correct, and describe a situation where Bobby is correct. Is it possible for a situation to exist that they are both correct? Justify your reasoning.

1 Answer

1 vote
charles funcion
it is any function without (x+2)(x-3)(x-5) in the deonmenator
so it can be like
f(x)=3x+4

dividing by zero is undefined so
f(x)=
(1)/((x+2)(x-3)(x-5)) would be a place where the function is undefined at x=-2,x=3 and x=5



charles: f(x)=3x+4
bobby: f(x)=
(1)/((x+2)(x-3)(x-5))
there is no function where both are correct, it cannot be both defined and undefined


User Esskar
by
7.2k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories