1.9k views
2 votes
Danika concludes that the following functions are inverses of each other because f(g(x)) = x. Do you agree with Danika? Explain your reasoning.

f(x) = |x|
g(x) = –x

User Cfraser
by
8.3k points

2 Answers

4 votes

that Danika needs to find g compose f

that g(f(x)) must also equal x

that g(f(x)) = –x

User PeteyPabPro
by
8.8k points
4 votes
We cannot agree with Danika. Why? Well, The reasoning is given as follows:

Two functions are inverses of each other if and only if it is true that the composition function is given by:


f(g(x))=x

Everything is ok up to this point, right?. But let's prove that this is not fulfilled for these functions, then:


f(x)=\left | x \right | \\ \\ g(x)=-x \\ \\ f(g(x))=\left| -x \right |=\left | -1 \right | \left | x \right |=\left | x \right | \\ \\ \therefore f(g(x))=\left | x \right | \\eq x

As you can see we did not obtain the function that matches the definition of inverse functions. For that reason we can't agree with Danika.
User Bassirou
by
7.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.