86.9k views
5 votes
How can you use this document to make an argument that the arms build-up was a more important underlying cause than the network of alliances

User Ttemple
by
7.7k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

Germany was lagging behind many countries, mostly Britain in the arms build-up. Germany wanted to grow out their militarism to either keep its nation safe or to expand, all for its self-benefit. It was also to show that Germany was capable of independence from the network of allies they had.

(Counter:)

However, since one country had joined an alliance with others, their military powers would be combined and would've had a bigger impact than a single country. The network of alliances let nations help each other in war and with this extra power, they were able to control and have more power against a single nation.

User AKZap
by
8.9k points
3 votes
"The arms build-up was a more important underlying cause than the network of alliances." This statement presents an argument that building more arms is more important than building your alliances. It shows a personal preparation and independence form other alliances. It is believed that they can face the battle on their own.
User Sharjeel Ali
by
7.4k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.