Final answer:
The author's effectiveness in addressing a counterclaim is determined by their immediate use of evidence to refute it and whether they show a deep understanding of the argument. Citing credible data from reputable sources and strategically placing counterarguments early in the text contribute to an effective response.
Step-by-step explanation:
When evaluating how well an author addresses a counterclaim, it's important to analyze the effectiveness of the response based on the use of evidence and the structure within the argument. The response could be deemed ineffective if the author does not immediately refute the counterclaims with evidence, or if they wait until later in the text to address them. On the other hand, an effective response would include the author citing credible data to refute the claim, showing an understanding of the opposition's argument, and then providing reasoning and evidence to counter it. The effectiveness also depends on how well they convey their argument about the rhetorical situation, including awareness of the audience's logic and emotions.
In the case of the counterclaim that wind power is a passing trend, a response could be effective if, for instance, the author cites statistics from a reputable source like the American Wind Energy Association. This action shows that the author has done their research to support their claim that wind energy is a viable alternative to fossil fuels. To enhance the response, addressing counterclaims early on in the paper is strategic, setting the stage for a focused argument throughout the text. An author's ability to empathize with the counterclaim positions before effectively refuting them demonstrates an advanced skill in argumentation.