6.4k views
5 votes
-3(w-3)≥9-3w

If all real numbers can solve please tell me why

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer: " w = (all real numbers) " —as explained below.

_________

Explanation:

_________

Given the following "inequality":

_________

" -3(w – 3) ≥ 9 – 3w " ; Solve for "w" ;

and see if the answer ["value for "w"]; is:

"all real numbers."

_________

→ " -3(w – 3) ≥ 9 – 3w " ;

_________

Method 1):

_________

On the "right-hand side" of the "inequality";

Factor out a "(-3)" ;

_________

" -3(w – 3) ≥ ( -3 * ? = 9?) (-3 * ? = 3w? ) " ;

_________

1) " -3 * (what value?) = 9 "?

Let "x" be the 'unknown value' :

→ " -3x = 9 " ;

Divide each side of the equation by "(-3)" ;

to isolate "x" on one of the equation;

& to solve for "x" ;

-3x / -3 = 9 / -3 ;

to get: " x = -3 " ;

_________

2) " -3 * (what value?) = 3w " ?

Let "x" be the 'unknown value' :

→ " -3x = 3w " ? ;

→ Divide each side or the equation by ("-3").

→ to isolate "x" on one side of the equation;

→ & to solve for "x" ;

-3x / 3 = 3w / -3 ;

to get: x = -1w ;

_________

So: " -3(w – 3) ≥ -3* (? = 9?) – (-3 * ? = 3w?) " ;

_________

Rewrite as:

" -3(w – 3) ≥ -3* [(-3 – (-1w)] " ;

_________

Now, let us consider the Following Portion of the "right-hand side" of the inequality:;

" (-3 – (-1w)] = " (-3 + 1w) " ;

→ {since: "subtracting a "negative value is the equivalent of adding that particular value's positive value"} ;

and bring down the "(-3)" on the "right-hand side" of the inequality; and rewrite the inequality as:

_________

" -3(w – 3) ≥ -3(-3 + 1w) " ;

→ Now, divide EACH SIDE of the inequality by "(-3)" :

{Note: Each time when one multiplies or divides an inequality by a "negative value"—the inequality sign flips to the other direction.}.

→ [ -3(w – 3)] / -3 ≥ [-3(-3 + 1w ] / -3 ;

to get:

→ " (w – 3) ≤ (-3 + 1w) " ;

_________

Note: " (-3 + 1w) " ; ↔ " [(1w + (-3)] = " 1w – 3 " = "w – 3 " ;

_________

Rewrite the inequality:

_________

→ " (w – 3) ≤ (w – 3 ) " ;

↔ " w – 3 ≤ w – 3 " ;

The same value is equal to each other: not less than or equal to each other: For instance:

→ " w – 3 ≤ w – 3 " ;

If we add "3" to each side of the equation:

→ " w – 3 + 3 ≤ w – 3 + 3 " ;

We get: " w ≤ w " . "w = w". "w is not "less than" itself. So all real numbers apply!

_________

Method 2)

_________

Given the following "inequality":

_________

" -3(w – 3) ≥ 9 – 3w " ; Solve for "w" ;

and see if the answer ["value for "w"]; is:

"all real numbers."

_________

On the "left-hand side of the inequality;

we have:

_________

" -3(w – 3) " ;

_________

Take note of the "distributive property of multiplication" :

→ " a(b + c) = ab + ac " ;

_________

As such:

_________

We can expand:

" -3(w – 3) = (-3*w) + (-3*-3) " ;

= -3w + (9) ;

_________

Now, we can rewrite the original inequality:

_________

" -3w + 9 ≥ 9 – 3w " ;

_________

Note: " -3w + 9 = 9 + (-3w) = 9 – 3w " ;

→ {since: adding a "negative value" gets the same value as subtracting that value's "positive equivalent"};

And we can rewrite our inequality as:

_________

" 9 – 3w ≥ 9 – 3w " ;

_________

Note: We have the same value on each side.

"(9 – 3w)" is not greater than itself; it is "equal to itself".

Any and all real numbers as values for "w" will result in the same value for any particular expression's Exact Same Expression!

_________

So: "w = (all real numbers)" .

_________

Hope this is helpful to you!

Best wishes!

_________

User Eric Burke
by
7.6k points
7 votes
Hi there! I can help you! First, we have to do the distributive property on the left side to get us -3w + 9 >= 9 - 3w. Next, because 3w is negative, we add 3w to both sides to get the whole number by itself. with that, we would get 9 >= 9, which is true. 9 is equal to 9. Because the sentence is true, it would mean all real numbers can work. The answer is all real numbers.
User Ehz
by
8.4k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.