6.4k views
5 votes
-3(w-3)≥9-3w

If all real numbers can solve please tell me why

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer: " w = (all real numbers) " —as explained below.

_________

Explanation:

_________

Given the following "inequality":

_________

" -3(w – 3) ≥ 9 – 3w " ; Solve for "w" ;

and see if the answer ["value for "w"]; is:

"all real numbers."

_________

→ " -3(w – 3) ≥ 9 – 3w " ;

_________

Method 1):

_________

On the "right-hand side" of the "inequality";

Factor out a "(-3)" ;

_________

" -3(w – 3) ≥ ( -3 * ? = 9?) (-3 * ? = 3w? ) " ;

_________

1) " -3 * (what value?) = 9 "?

Let "x" be the 'unknown value' :

→ " -3x = 9 " ;

Divide each side of the equation by "(-3)" ;

to isolate "x" on one of the equation;

& to solve for "x" ;

-3x / -3 = 9 / -3 ;

to get: " x = -3 " ;

_________

2) " -3 * (what value?) = 3w " ?

Let "x" be the 'unknown value' :

→ " -3x = 3w " ? ;

→ Divide each side or the equation by ("-3").

→ to isolate "x" on one side of the equation;

→ & to solve for "x" ;

-3x / 3 = 3w / -3 ;

to get: x = -1w ;

_________

So: " -3(w – 3) ≥ -3* (? = 9?) – (-3 * ? = 3w?) " ;

_________

Rewrite as:

" -3(w – 3) ≥ -3* [(-3 – (-1w)] " ;

_________

Now, let us consider the Following Portion of the "right-hand side" of the inequality:;

" (-3 – (-1w)] = " (-3 + 1w) " ;

→ {since: "subtracting a "negative value is the equivalent of adding that particular value's positive value"} ;

and bring down the "(-3)" on the "right-hand side" of the inequality; and rewrite the inequality as:

_________

" -3(w – 3) ≥ -3(-3 + 1w) " ;

→ Now, divide EACH SIDE of the inequality by "(-3)" :

{Note: Each time when one multiplies or divides an inequality by a "negative value"—the inequality sign flips to the other direction.}.

→ [ -3(w – 3)] / -3 ≥ [-3(-3 + 1w ] / -3 ;

to get:

→ " (w – 3) ≤ (-3 + 1w) " ;

_________

Note: " (-3 + 1w) " ; ↔ " [(1w + (-3)] = " 1w – 3 " = "w – 3 " ;

_________

Rewrite the inequality:

_________

→ " (w – 3) ≤ (w – 3 ) " ;

↔ " w – 3 ≤ w – 3 " ;

The same value is equal to each other: not less than or equal to each other: For instance:

→ " w – 3 ≤ w – 3 " ;

If we add "3" to each side of the equation:

→ " w – 3 + 3 ≤ w – 3 + 3 " ;

We get: " w ≤ w " . "w = w". "w is not "less than" itself. So all real numbers apply!

_________

Method 2)

_________

Given the following "inequality":

_________

" -3(w – 3) ≥ 9 – 3w " ; Solve for "w" ;

and see if the answer ["value for "w"]; is:

"all real numbers."

_________

On the "left-hand side of the inequality;

we have:

_________

" -3(w – 3) " ;

_________

Take note of the "distributive property of multiplication" :

→ " a(b + c) = ab + ac " ;

_________

As such:

_________

We can expand:

" -3(w – 3) = (-3*w) + (-3*-3) " ;

= -3w + (9) ;

_________

Now, we can rewrite the original inequality:

_________

" -3w + 9 ≥ 9 – 3w " ;

_________

Note: " -3w + 9 = 9 + (-3w) = 9 – 3w " ;

→ {since: adding a "negative value" gets the same value as subtracting that value's "positive equivalent"};

And we can rewrite our inequality as:

_________

" 9 – 3w ≥ 9 – 3w " ;

_________

Note: We have the same value on each side.

"(9 – 3w)" is not greater than itself; it is "equal to itself".

Any and all real numbers as values for "w" will result in the same value for any particular expression's Exact Same Expression!

_________

So: "w = (all real numbers)" .

_________

Hope this is helpful to you!

Best wishes!

_________

User Eric Burke
by
7.2k points
7 votes
Hi there! I can help you! First, we have to do the distributive property on the left side to get us -3w + 9 >= 9 - 3w. Next, because 3w is negative, we add 3w to both sides to get the whole number by itself. with that, we would get 9 >= 9, which is true. 9 is equal to 9. Because the sentence is true, it would mean all real numbers can work. The answer is all real numbers.
User Ehz
by
7.9k points