157k views
5 votes
Which best describes consensus historiography?. . A. a bottom-up look at historical events to rethink the traditional perspective . B. a re-interpretation of facts based on new evidence and resulting in new conclusions. C. a revisionist interpretation of events in which all viewpoints are considered. D. a top-down look at historical events to rethink the traditional perspective. E. a view of history in which the traditional interpretation is upheld

User AlexJF
by
8.8k points

2 Answers

3 votes
i go with E .a view of history in which the traditional interpretation is upheld.
I hope this help....
User Csierra
by
7.6k points
3 votes

Answer:

The right answer is E, that, a view of history in which the traditional interpretation is upheld best

Step-by-step explanation:

This kind of historiography deals with the most important part of American Values and moderates roughness as short-sighted and absent in complexity. This History took part between 1950 and 1960 and it put in question the beliefs of the Progressive and Marxist, starting a tension between them because they supported there was a lack of inside battle in the country. This type of historiography started to highlight the importance of class conflict in American History.

User Luis Miguel Sierra
by
8.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.