29.5k views
5 votes
Heights of adult males are known to have a normal distribution. a researcher claims to have randomly selected adult males and measured their heights with the resulting relative frequency distribution as shown here. identify two major flaws with these results. height​ (cm) relative frequency 130dash–144 2222​% 145dash–159 2424​% 160dash–174 2121​% 175dash–189 2626​% 190dash–204 2828​%

User Tayeb
by
8.3k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

The sum of the probabilities is greater than 100%; and the distribution is too uniform to be a normal distribution.

Explanation:

The sum of the probabilities of a distribution should be 100%. When you add the probabilities of this distribution together, you have

22+24+21+26+28 = 46+21+26+28 = 67+26+28 = 93+28 = 121

This is more than 100%, which is a flaw with the results.

A normal distribution is a bell-shaped distribution. Graphing the probabilities for this distribution, we would have a bar up to 22; a bar to 24; a bar to 21; a bar to 26; and bar to 28.

The bars would not create a bell-shaped curve; thus this is not a normal distribution.

User Scordo
by
8.7k points
4 votes
From the table the major flaws that can be identified are:
1. The sum of the relative frequencies of the dat set is greater than 100% which is not possible.
For any dataset, the sum of the relative freduency must be 100%

2.) the distribution of the data is not symmetric.
User Clive Paterson
by
8.7k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories