1.2k views
19 votes
What did the US Supreme Court decide in this case?

Restrictive covenants could be decided on a case-by-case basis.
Lawmakers had the right to make racial restrictions in housing legal.
The Fourteenth Amendment supported the concept of a restrictive covenant.
Racial restrictions in housing were not constitutional and could not be enforced.

User Fanton
by
4.4k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

prohibited the sale of property to non-Caucasians unconstitutionally violate the equal protection provision

User Balpha
by
3.8k points
14 votes

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Racial restrictions in housing were not constitutional and could not be enforced.

User Sandeep J Patel
by
4.3k points