Final answer:
The interview with Thurgood Marshall likely provides a more personal and reflective account of his experiences and views on fighting racism compared to the informational piece which probably focuses on his legal accomplishments and contributions to civil rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks to compare the interview “On the Front Lines with Thurgood Marshall” with the informational piece “Equal Justice Under Law: Thurgood Marshall” and specifically to identify key information that is expanded on in the interview but not as deeply explored in the informational piece.
Based on the provided text, the interview seems to offer a more personal reflection of Thurgood Marshall's views and experiences in the fight against racism. It may dive into his personal life, strategies, and opinions that are not as thoroughly covered in the factual retelling of his legal battles and achievements described in the informational piece.
In the interview, there could be a focus on Marshall's perspectives on the enduring nature of racism, the necessity of not solely relying on legal approaches but also engaging in political strategies, and his insights into the broader civil rights movement.
In contrast, the informational piece probably presents a chronological account of Marshall's legal work and its impact on civil rights, highlighting key cases like Brown v. Board of Education and his role in establishing the NAACP’s Legal Defense and Education Fund. While facts and historical milestones are essential, the interview format allows for a more expansive examination of Marshall's personal contributions and thoughts, thus providing a more nuanced understanding of his role in history.