65.8k views
5 votes
English help pls,,, I'm really confused with this question, can someone help me? Please don't just copy & paste someone else's answer because I already saw it and it did not help me.

------
Look at these brief notes taken after reading biographies of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. Use the information to answer the questions that follow in a few sentences.

George Washington:
Grew up on a large plantation.
Owned slaves.
Reputation for honesty.
Army general.
Served two terms in office.
Credited with nation's independence.
Founding Father.

Abraham Lincoln:
Born in a log cabin on a small farm was against slavery.
Reputation for honesty.
Lawyer and US Representative.
Assassinated during second term.
Led nation during Civil War.
Ended Slavery.

Based on the comparison notes of Washington and Lincoln, which aspects of their backgrounds do NOT seem to have an effect on their success as president?

User VsMaX
by
5.6k points

2 Answers

4 votes
Growing up on plantation, owned slaves, served two terms, and possibly founding father should be eliminated from washington

for abraham, Born in log cabin,assassinated, and possibly led nation during civil war.
User Kaustubh Khavnekar
by
6.4k points
1 vote

The correct answers are:

George Washington

  • Grew up on a large plantation.
  • Owned slaves.
  • Served two terms in office.

Abraham Lincoln

  • Born in a log cabin on a small farm was against slavery.
  • Assassinated during second term.

The birthplace and young life home of anybody is irrelevant to their success later in life since one's knowledge and capabilities for a job such as the presidential office comes with higher education.

In the case of George Washington, owning slaves may speak of Washington as a person, but it doesn't play a role in his performance as president, neither does his two-term service, as quantity of time does not necessarily equal quality in the job. It may be argued whether his "Founding Father" signature is of any significance in here, but it is undeniable evidence of his participation in the creation of a country, and his service as first president of such.

In the case of Abraham Lincoln, his assassination doesn't relate to his quality as president, as it was a subsequent event to his service, and there could be numerous reasons for its explanation.

User Iaomw
by
5.7k points