54.6k views
2 votes
What is the reason for step 5 in this proof?

A .Vertical Angles Theorem
B. Opposite interior angles of a parallelogram are congruent.
C. All angles of a rectangle have the same measure.
D. Alternate Interior Angles Theorem

What is the reason for step 5 in this proof? A .Vertical Angles Theorem B. Opposite-example-1
User EdenSource
by
6.4k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

Opposite interior angles of a parallelogram are congruent.

Explanation:

To answer this question let's do it step by step. So step

1) Consider the parallelogram GDEF

2) Trace a straight line, since two points define a line. Trace
\overline{GE} and another
\overline{DF}

3) Consider these pair of parallel segments:


\overline{GD}\parallel \overline{EF}\\\overline{DE}\parallel\overline{GF}

4) Now let's examine the angles. According to Euclides since DE and GF are parallels we can say that:


\angle \alpha \cong \angle \gamma \\\ \angle \beta \cong \angle \delta

5) This step is the conclusion of the previous one, since alternate interior angles have the same measure, so


\angle \alpha +\angle \beta \cong \angle \gamma +\angle \delta

Opposite interior angles of a parallelogram are congruent.

What is the reason for step 5 in this proof? A .Vertical Angles Theorem B. Opposite-example-1
What is the reason for step 5 in this proof? A .Vertical Angles Theorem B. Opposite-example-2
User MikeSli
by
6.2k points
4 votes
B. Opposite interior angles of a parallelogram are congruent.
User Rohim Chou
by
5.5k points