152k views
0 votes
Tabitha defines a sphere as the set of all points equidistant from a single point. Is Tabitha's definition valid?

User Rmeador
by
7.8k points

2 Answers

6 votes

Answer: Yes, Talid's definition is valid.

Explanation:

  • Definition of sphere:- In geometry , a sphere is a perfectly round three-dimensional shape . It is defined as the set of points that are all at the same distance which is known as radius from a given point in a 3-dimensional space.

  • Talid's definition:- A sphere as the set of all points equidistant from a single point.

Hence, Talid's definition is valid.

User Hhanesand
by
8.6k points
2 votes
Answer
YES it is VALID.

Explanation.
In 3 dimension, it can be seen that a sphere is a round solid. It is a round object where the distance from the centre to every point on the surface is equal.
Tabitha says that a sphere is a set of all points equidistant from a single point. This single point must be the centre of the sphere for that definition to be true. This definition is correct.
User Rondell
by
8.0k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.